Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RPMGX
FSMAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RPMGX
FSMAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RPMGX (23.2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RPMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). RPMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. RPMGX (3.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. RPMGX (-17.07).
| FSMAX | RPMGX | FSMAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 8.011 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 23.2B | 173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | 3.20 | 810% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | 5.56 | 1,336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | -17.07 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | 35.87 | 402% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement