Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RPMGX
FSMAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RPMGX
FSMAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RPMGX (22.6B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RPMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). RPMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.94 vs. RPMGX (0.10). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.73 vs. RPMGX (-18.36).
| FSMAX | RPMGX | FSMAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.403 | 2.036 | 707% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 22.6B | 189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.94 | 0.10 | 27,697% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.15 | 1.09 | 6,162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | -18.36 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.10 | 34.60 | 425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers