Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RRMGX
FSMAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RRMGX
FSMAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RRMGX (23.2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RRMGX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.08 vs. RRMGX (1.17). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. RRMGX (-21.07).
| FSMAX | RRMGX | FSMAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.890 | 2.177 | 684% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 23.2B | 184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.08 | 1.17 | 2,568% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.38 | -0.10 | -70,487% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.47 | -21.07 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.95 | 20.65 | 697% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers