Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RRMGX
FSMAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RRMGX
FSMAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. RRMGX (22B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs RRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RRMGX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.94 vs. RRMGX (-5.61). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.87 vs. RRMGX (-26.16).
| FSMAX | RRMGX | FSMAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.380 | 1.006 | 1,330% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 22B | 198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.94 | -5.61 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.75 | -8.43 | -673% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.87 | -26.16 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.49 | 15.18 | 860% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers