Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RRMGX
FSMAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RRMGX
FSMAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RRMGX (23.2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RRMGX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. RRMGX (1.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. RRMGX (-21.94).
| FSMAX | RRMGX | FSMAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 7.655 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 23.2B | 173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | 1.76 | 1,477% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | 1.39 | 5,332% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | -21.94 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | 23.71 | 608% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement