Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RSMOX
FSMAX vs RSMOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RSMOX
FSMAX vs RSMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RSMOX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and RSMOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RSMOX (70.9M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RSMOX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RSMOX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RSMOX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RSMOX (31 years). RSMOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSMOX: FSMAX (0) vs RSMOX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.01 vs. RSMOX (13.12). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.68 vs. RSMOX (-20.03).
| FSMAX | RSMOX | FSMAX / RSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.374 | 11.945 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 70.9M | 60,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.01 | 13.12 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.18 | 50.53 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.68 | -20.03 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.44 | 30.39 | 495% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers