Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RSMOX
FSMAX vs RSMOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RSMOX
FSMAX vs RSMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RSMOX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RSMOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RSMOX (66.5M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RSMOX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RSMOX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RSMOX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RSMOX (31 years). RSMOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSMOX: FSMAX (0) vs RSMOX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. RSMOX (3.78). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. RSMOX (-26.24).
| FSMAX | RSMOX | FSMAX / RSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 5.848 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 66.5M | 60,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 3.78 | 544% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 40.92 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -26.24 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 21.12 | 634% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers