Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs RYBHX
FSMAX vs RYBHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RYBHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$84.65
Change+$1.43 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth H
Price$45.92
Change+$0.90 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.36M
FSMAX vs RYBHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RYBHX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RYBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. RYBHX (25.4M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RYBHX: FSMAX (0.53) vs RYBHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RYBHX: FSMAX (14 years) vs RYBHX (21 years). RYBHX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RYBHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 570.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBHX: FSMAX (0) vs RYBHX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. RYBHX (-22.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.79 vs. RYBHX (43.60).
| FSMAX | RYBHX | FSMAX / RYBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.429 | -8.793 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 25.4M | 143,701% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | -22.81 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.51 | -16.43 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.79 | 43.60 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.37 | -16.24 | -341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers