Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RYBHX
FSMAX vs RYBHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RYBHX
FSMAX vs RYBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RYBHX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RYBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RYBHX (26.4M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RYBHX: FSMAX (0.49) vs RYBHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RYBHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RYBHX (23 years). RYBHX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RYBHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1337.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBHX: FSMAX (0) vs RYBHX (2500). RYBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.13 vs. FSMAX (11.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.70 vs. RYBHX (-11.87).
| FSMAX | RYBHX | FSMAX / RYBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.983 | 11.314 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 26.4M | 151,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | 13.13 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.80 | 29.00 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.70 | -11.87 | -276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.89 | 22.67 | 555% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement