Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RYBHX
FSMAX vs RYBHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RYBHX
FSMAX vs RYBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RYBHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RYBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RYBHX (30.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RYBHX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RYBHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RYBHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RYBHX (22 years). RYBHX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RYBHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1337.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBHX: FSMAX (0) vs RYBHX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. RYBHX (16.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. RYBHX (-9.92).
| FSMAX | RYBHX | FSMAX / RYBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.52 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 12.804 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 30.1M | 133,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 16.81 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 24.55 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -9.92 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 24.34 | 550% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers