Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RYMGX
FSMAX vs RYMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RYMGX
FSMAX vs RYMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RYMGX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RYMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RYMGX (32.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RYMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RYMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RYMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RYMGX (22 years). RYMGX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RYMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1337.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RYMGX (2500). FSMAX (25.69) and RYMGX (25.50) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.70 vs. RYMGX (-4.30).
| FSMAX | RYMGX | FSMAX / RYMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.115 | 20.264 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 32.1M | 124,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.69 | 25.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.94 | 34.03 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.70 | -4.30 | -947% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.59 | 31.71 | 453% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement