Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RYMGX
FSMAX vs RYMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RYMGX
FSMAX vs RYMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RYMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and RYMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RYMGX (33.7M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RYMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RYMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RYMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RYMGX (22 years). RYMGX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RYMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 716.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMGX: FSMAX (0) vs RYMGX (2500). RYMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.08 vs. FSMAX (29.23). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. RYMGX (-1.92).
| FSMAX | RYMGX | FSMAX / RYMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 22.380 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 33.7M | 126,706% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 34.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 46.64 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -1.92 | -1,750% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 43.14 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement