Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SCNSX
FSMAX vs SCNSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SCNSX
FSMAX vs SCNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SCNSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SCNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SCNSX (627M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SCNSX: FSMAX (0.49) vs SCNSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SCNSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SCNSX (16 years). SCNSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCNSX: FSMAX (0) vs SCNSX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. SCNSX (8.50). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. SCNSX (-20.56).
| FSMAX | SCNSX | FSMAX / SCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.86 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 12.075 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 627M | 6,396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 8.50 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 17.29 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -20.56 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | -0.42 | -31,826% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement