Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SEMCX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. SEMCX (57.3M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SEMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SEMCX (0.48). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SEMCX (33 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMAX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.91 vs. SEMCX (2.67). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.50 vs. SEMCX (-0.72).
| FSMAX | SEMCX | FSMAX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.98 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.652 | 13.890 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 57.3M | 74,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.48 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.91 | 2.67 | 1,120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.58 | 19.93 | 339% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.50 | -0.72 | -5,244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.63 | 44.22 | 334% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers