Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SEMCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SEMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SEMCX (57.2M). FSMAX (0.49) and SEMCX (0.48) have matching dividends . FSMAX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SEMCX (34 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMAX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. SEMCX (-6.06). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. SEMCX (-5.60).
| FSMAX | SEMCX | FSMAX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.98 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 13.829 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 57.2M | 70,105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -6.06 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 18.97 | 337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -5.60 | -585% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 40.39 | 330% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement