Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SEMCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SEMCX (59.5M). FSMAX (0.50) and SEMCX (0.48) have matching dividends . FSMAX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SEMCX (34 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMAX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. SEMCX (0.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. SEMCX (-1.57).
| FSMAX | SEMCX | FSMAX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.98 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 17.628 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 59.5M | 67,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 0.48 | 4,928% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 24.65 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -1.57 | -2,559% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 40.10 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers