Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SEMCX
FSMAX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SEMCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. SEMCX (57.6M). FSMAX (0.48) and SEMCX (0.47) have matching dividends . FSMAX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SEMCX (33 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMAX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. SEMCX (-2.52). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. SEMCX (-4.70).
| FSMAX | SEMCX | FSMAX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.98 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.579 | 13.681 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 57.6M | 75,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.47 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.76 | -2.52 | -942% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.71 | 16.06 | 409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.74 | -4.70 | -761% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.62 | 38.67 | 364% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers