Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMDRX
FSMAX vs SMDRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMDRX
FSMAX vs SMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMDRX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SMDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SMDRX (1.08B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMDRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SMDRX (0.41). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMDRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SMDRX (12 years). SMDRX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDRX: FSMAX (0) vs SMDRX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. SMDRX (14.84). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. SMDRX (9.25).
| FSMAX | SMDRX | FSMAX / SMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.81 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.81 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 17.252 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.08B | 3,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.41 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 14.84 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 26.66 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | 9.25 | 359% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 87.73 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers