Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMDVX
FSMAX vs SMDVX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMDVX
FSMAX vs SMDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMDVX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMDVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SMDVX (1.11B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SMDVX (0.18). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMDVX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SMDVX (20 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDVX: FSMAX (0) vs SMDVX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. SMDVX (17.96). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. SMDVX (7.23).
| FSMAX | SMDVX | FSMAX / SMDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.16 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.16 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 19.866 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.11B | 3,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.18 | 280% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 17.96 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 31.39 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | 7.23 | 556% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 78.96 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers