Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$31.72
Change+$0.37 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets838.27M
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. SMFAX (838M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (1.10) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (13 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. SMFAX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. SMFAX (13.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.34 vs. SMFAX (40.42).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 5.207 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 838M | 4,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.28 | 13.94 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | 12.05 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | 40.42 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | 87.31 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...