Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$87.12
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$30.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.83M
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. SMFAX (644M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (0.54) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. SMFAX (2.51). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.33 vs. SMFAX (32.97).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.357 | 1.658 | -263% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 644M | 5,590% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 2.51 | 257% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.01 | 31.94 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.33 | 32.97 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.99 | 69.17 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers