Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$88.99
Change-$1.54 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$31.47
Change-$0.35 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.95M
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. SMFAX (639M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. SMFAX (8.11). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.48 vs. SMFAX (34.60).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.080 | 4.378 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 639M | 5,884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 8.11 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.57 | 42.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.48 | 34.60 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.64 | 72.31 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement