Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$33.88
Change+$0.25 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.55M
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. SMFAX (681M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (0.44) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.86 vs. SMFAX (16.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.29 vs. SMFAX (30.31).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.474 | 12.371 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 681M | 6,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.86 | 16.39 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.06 | 45.85 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.29 | 30.31 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.64 | 99.29 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement