Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.16
Change+$0.81 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$33.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets660.69M
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. SMFAX (661M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (0.47) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. SMFAX (12.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.51 vs. SMFAX (29.16).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.710 | 8.723 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 661M | 5,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 12.34 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.76 | 40.21 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.51 | 29.16 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.28 | 81.12 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement