Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. SMFAX (746M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. SMFAX (-13.66). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. SMFAX (-16.43).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.38 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 8.890 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 746M | 5,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -13.66 | -214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 9.67 | 764% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -16.43 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 81.26 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement