Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$23.78
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets816.52M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. SMFCX (817M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (13 years). SMFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. SMFCX (-6.22). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.85 vs. SMFCX (23.85).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.097 | -10.439 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 817M | 4,468% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | -6.22 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.53 | -2.39 | -231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.85 | 23.85 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.71 | 34.44 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers