Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.54
Change-$1.22 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$30.00
Change-$0.29 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets766.61M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. SMFCX (767M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.58 vs. SMFCX (12.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.17 vs. SMFCX (21.26).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.072 | 14.561 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 767M | 5,398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.58 | 12.94 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.02 | 51.07 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.17 | 21.26 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.23 | 85.12 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement