Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$28.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.82M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. SMFCX (714M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. SMFCX (0.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. SMFCX (9.61).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | 8.699 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 714M | 5,812% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | 0.95 | 382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 35.06 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | 9.61 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 74.65 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers