Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$29.21
Change-$0.12 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.35M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. SMFCX (662M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (13 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. SMFCX (18.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. SMFCX (19.27).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.478 | 10.477 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 662M | 5,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 18.31 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 28.45 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 19.27 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | 65.57 | 125% |