Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.57
Change+$1.10 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$28.84
Change+$0.33 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets655.36M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. SMFCX (655M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.47) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (13 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. SMFCX (8.73). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.86 vs. SMFCX (21.27).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.950 | 7.829 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 655M | 5,985% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 8.73 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 38.60 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.86 | 21.27 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.23 | 59.86 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement