Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. SMFCX (746M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. SMFCX (-16.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. SMFCX (-22.98).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 10.373 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 746M | 5,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -16.55 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 2.94 | 2,509% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -22.98 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 57.32 | 268% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers