Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMIPX
FSMAX vs SMIPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMIPX
FSMAX vs SMIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMIPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SMIPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SMIPX (10.8M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMIPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SMIPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMIPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SMIPX (24 years). SMIPX (2.22) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMIPX: FSMAX (0) vs SMIPX (250). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. SMIPX (-5.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. SMIPX (-7.63).
| FSMAX | SMIPX | FSMAX / SMIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 13.272 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 10.8M | 371,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -5.83 | -353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 10.59 | 527% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -7.63 | -435% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 9.03 | 1,482% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers