Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SSMHX
FSMAX vs SSMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SSMHX
FSMAX vs SSMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SSMHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SSMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SSMHX (2.78B). SSMHX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: SSMHX (1.17) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SSMHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SSMHX (11 years). FSMAX (0.04) is less costly to investors than SSMHX (0.01). SSMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and SSMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. SSMHX (15.07). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. SSMHX (7.96).
| FSMAX | SSMHX | FSMAX / SSMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 350% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 13.352 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.78B | 1,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.17 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 15.07 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 42.74 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | 7.96 | 417% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 114.08 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers