Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SSMHX
FSMAX vs SSMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SSMHX
FSMAX vs SSMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SSMHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SSMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SSMHX (2.8B). SSMHX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: SSMHX (1.14) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SSMHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SSMHX (11 years). FSMAX (0.04) is less costly to investors than SSMHX (0.01). SSMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and SSMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. SSMHX (8.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. SSMHX (7.95).
| FSMAX | SSMHX | FSMAX / SSMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 350% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 13.915 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.8B | 1,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.14 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 8.02 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 50.78 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 7.95 | 412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 114.78 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers