Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SSMKX
FSMAX vs SSMKX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SSMKX
FSMAX vs SSMKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SSMKX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and SSMKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SSMKX (856M). SSMKX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: SSMKX (1.68) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SSMKX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SSMKX (11 years). SSMKX (0.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SSMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and SSMKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. SSMKX (11.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.75 vs. SSMKX (9.93).
| FSMAX | SSMKX | FSMAX / SSMKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.13 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.205 | 14.712 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 856M | 4,685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.68 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.88 | 11.44 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.12 | 61.52 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.75 | 9.93 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.14 | 124.46 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers