Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs STRGX
FSMAX vs STRGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs STRGX
FSMAX vs STRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. STRGX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and STRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. STRGX (50.4M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than STRGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs STRGX (0.37). FSMAX was incepted earlier than STRGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs STRGX (54 years). STRGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). STRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRGX: FSMAX (0) vs STRGX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. STRGX (0.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.42 vs. STRGX (-19.44).
| FSMAX | STRGX | FSMAX / STRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.506 | 12.159 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 50.4M | 79,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.37 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 0.20 | 6,553% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.66 | -0.47 | -13,648% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.42 | -19.44 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.58 | 20.31 | 633% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement