Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCGRX
FSMAX vs TCGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R4
Price$32.41
Change+$0.75 (+2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.3M
FSMAX vs TCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCGRX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TCGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. TCGRX (217M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCGRX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TCGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCGRX (19 years). TCGRX (3.49) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.58 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and TCGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. TCGRX (6.72). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. TCGRX (-35.32).
| FSMAX | TCGRX | FSMAX / TCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.36 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.49 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | 3.778 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 217M | 19,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 6.72 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.00 | 49.63 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | -35.32 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 17.81 | 588% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement