Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCGRX
FSMAX vs TCGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCGRX
FSMAX vs TCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCGRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TCGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. TCGRX (235M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCGRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TCGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCGRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TCGRX (19 years). TCGRX (4.63) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.06 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and TCGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. TCGRX (25.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. TCGRX (-29.76).
| FSMAX | TCGRX | FSMAX / TCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.12 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 4.63 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 12.147 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 235M | 18,170% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 25.46 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 47.90 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -29.76 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 43.54 | 352% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers