Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth I
Price$23.16
Change+$0.12 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets860.24M
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. TCMHX (860M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.46) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCMHX (10 years). TCMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). TCMHX (22.75) and FSMAX (21.74) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. TCMHX (-4.85).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.478 | 7.563 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 860M | 4,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 22.75 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 25.28 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | -4.85 | -1,058% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | N/A | - |