Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth I
Price$22.51
Change+$0.21 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.14M
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. TCMHX (844M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCMHX (10 years). TCMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. TCMHX (10.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. TCMHX (2.73).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.044 | 4.108 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 844M | 4,455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 10.83 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | 33.19 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.38 | 2.73 | 2,357% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.79 | N/A | - |