Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth I
Price$22.34
Change+$0.16 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.09M
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. TCMHX (998M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (1.10) vs TCMHX (0.09). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (13 years) vs TCMHX (9 years). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. TCMHX (15.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. TCMHX (0.60).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 4.295 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 998M | 4,088% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.09 | 1,201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 15.27 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 4.02 | 533% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | 0.60 | 8,059% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | N/A | - |