Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth I
Price$21.10
Change-$0.62 (-2.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets928.2M
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. TCMHX (928M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (1.10) vs TCMHX (0.09). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (13 years) vs TCMHX (9 years). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. TCMHX (2.63). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. TCMHX (-6.08).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | -1.494 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 928M | 4,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.09 | 1,201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 2.63 | 586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 2.98 | 816% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | -6.08 | -681% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...