Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. TCMHX (672M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TCMHX (11 years). TCMHX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.36 vs. TCMHX (-9.41). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.79 vs. TCMHX (-32.58).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.172 | 1.140 | 1,418% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 672M | 6,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.36 | -9.41 | -291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.44 | 7.94 | 862% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.79 | -32.58 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.88 | 6.67 | 2,216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers