Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TCMHX (643M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TCMHX (11 years). TCMHX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.85 vs. TCMHX (-11.11). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. TCMHX (-32.75).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.334 | 2.380 | 728% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 643M | 6,236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.85 | -11.11 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.50 | 12.65 | 565% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | -32.75 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.98 | 3.34 | 4,067% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers