Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TCMHX (617M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.49) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TCMHX (11 years). TCMHX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. TCMHX (-14.58). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.42 vs. TCMHX (-34.77).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.506 | -0.397 | -3,153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 617M | 6,499% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | -14.58 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.66 | 9.72 | 665% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.42 | -34.77 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.58 | 2.33 | 5,520% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement