Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs THCGX
FSMAX vs THCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs THCGX
FSMAX vs THCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. THCGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and THCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. THCGX (227M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than THCGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs THCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than THCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs THCGX (26 years). THCGX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). THCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.06 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than THCGX: FSMAX (0) vs THCGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. THCGX (15.75). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. THCGX (-33.75).
| FSMAX | THCGX | FSMAX / THCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.36 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.36 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 8.973 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 227M | 17,665% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 15.75 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 36.45 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -33.75 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 30.02 | 446% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers