Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMAPX
FSMAX vs TMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMAPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
FSMAX vs TMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMAPX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. TMAPX (5.35B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMAPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TMAPX (0.04). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMAPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TMAPX (18 years). TMAPX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMAPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.16 vs. TMAPX (0.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.51 vs. TMAPX (44.26).
| FSMAX | TMAPX | FSMAX / TMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.17 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.17 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.838 | 2.308 | 470% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 5.35B | 767% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.04 | 1,245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 0.02 | 93,817% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.15 | 34.29 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.51 | 44.26 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.14 | 132.21 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers