Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMAPX
FSMAX vs TMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMAPX
FSMAX vs TMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMAPX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TMAPX (3.51B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMAPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TMAPX (0.01). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMAPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMAPX (19 years). TMAPX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. TMAPX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMAPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.51 vs. TMAPX (4.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. TMAPX (23.26).
| FSMAX | TMAPX | FSMAX / TMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.039 | 4.698 | 384% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 3.51B | 1,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.01 | 3,812% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.51 | 4.54 | 540% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.02 | 23.83 | 311% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.46 | 23.26 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.54 | 120.80 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement