Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMCGX
FSMAX vs TMCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMCGX
FSMAX vs TMCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMCGX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TMCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. TMCGX (33.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMCGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs TMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMCGX (6 years). TMCGX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs TMCGX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. TMCGX (7.52). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. TMCGX (1.04).
| FSMAX | TMCGX | FSMAX / TMCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.58 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.698 | 8.508 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 33.1M | 131,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 7.52 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.16 | 22.91 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.56 | 1.04 | 3,239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.04 | 7.24 | 1,823% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement