FSMAX
Price
$117.20
Change
+$1.47 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
40.07B
TMCGX
Price
$16.70
Change
+$0.29 (+1.77%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
32.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSMAX vs TMCGX

FSMAX vs TMCGX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 20.05B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 32.09M to 40.07B. FSMAX holds the highest valuation in this group at 40.07B. The lowest valued company is TMCGX at 32.09M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -3%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 14%. FSMAX experienced the highest price growth at -3%, while TMCGX experienced the biggest fall at -3%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
FSMAX vs. TMCGX commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMCGX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TMCGX (32.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMCGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs TMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMCGX (7 years). TMCGX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs TMCGX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.31 vs. TMCGX (7.26). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. TMCGX (-3.24).
FSMAXTMCGXFSMAX / TMCGX
Total Expense Ratio0.040.904%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.041.582%
Fund Existence15 years7 years-
Gain YTD14.9609.293161%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment02000-
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets40.1B32.1M124,922%
Annual Yield % from dividends0.490.00-
Returns for 1 year18.317.26252%
Returns for 3 years62.4226.80233%
Returns for 5 years31.17-3.24-961%
Returns for 10 years129.516.571,970%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGEVX15.300.11
+0.70%
Baillie Gifford International Growth 5
WSCYX22.730.14
+0.62%
Nomura Small Cap Growth Y
AAWEX23.44N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill World Energy & Power A
PCCOX75.94N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research I
VEILX17.23N/A
N/A
VELA International A