Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMCGX
FSMAX vs TMCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMCGX
FSMAX vs TMCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMCGX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. TMCGX (33.9M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMCGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs TMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMCGX (6 years). TMCGX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs TMCGX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. TMCGX (12.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.59 vs. TMCGX (5.27).
| FSMAX | TMCGX | FSMAX / TMCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.58 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 11.126 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 33.9M | 128,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | 12.08 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.76 | 29.42 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.59 | 5.27 | 675% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.51 | 13.43 | 1,114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement