Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMCPX
FSMAX vs TMCPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMCPX
FSMAX vs TMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMCPX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TMCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TMCPX (3.58B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMCPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TMCPX (0.25). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMCPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMCPX (24 years). TMCPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. TMCPX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMCPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. TMCPX (7.22). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. TMCPX (26.01).
| FSMAX | TMCPX | FSMAX / TMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 6.987 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 3.58B | 1,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.25 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | 7.22 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | 24.99 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | 26.01 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | 132.46 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement