Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMCPX
FSMAX vs TMCPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMCPX
FSMAX vs TMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMCPX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. TMCPX (4.49B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMCPX: FSMAX (0.48) vs TMCPX (0.24). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMCPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMCPX (24 years). TMCPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. TMCPX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMCPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. TMCPX (4.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.59 vs. TMCPX (23.14).
| FSMAX | TMCPX | FSMAX / TMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 4.270 | 397% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 4.49B | 969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.24 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | 4.39 | 585% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.76 | 23.48 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.59 | 23.14 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.51 | 139.54 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers