Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TMDPX (1.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.49) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMDPX (22 years). TMDPX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. TMDPX (-9.98). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.70 vs. TMDPX (-28.67).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.874 | 5.108 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.62B | 2,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | -9.98 | -172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.96 | 10.08 | 674% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.70 | -28.67 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.32 | -10.13 | -1,355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers