Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$81.49
Change+$2.00 (+2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$15.31
Change+$0.37 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. TMDPX (1.38B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.53) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TMDPX (20 years). TMDPX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. TMDPX (-7.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. TMDPX (-5.98).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.118 | -5.022 | 281% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.38B | 2,653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -7.15 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.08 | 0.88 | 1,148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | -5.98 | -1,054% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | -24.09 | -190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...