Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.23
Change+$2.27 (+2.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$17.85
Change+$0.30 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. TMDPX (1.71B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TMDPX (21 years). TMDPX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. TMDPX (1.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.22 vs. TMDPX (-17.18).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.891 | 11.570 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 1.71B | 2,418% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.40 | 1.33 | 934% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.38 | 40.06 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.22 | -17.18 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.05 | -5.90 | -1,696% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement