Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$16.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. TMDPX (1.42B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (1.10) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (13 years) vs TMDPX (20 years). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. TMDPX (7.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. TMDPX (-11.57).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 4.450 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.42B | 2,867% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 7.04 | 371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 5.59 | 383% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | -11.57 | -418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | -8.42 | -1,071% |