Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$90.53
Change-$0.18 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$16.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. TMDPX (1.58B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TMDPX (20 years). TMDPX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. TMDPX (2.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.58 vs. TMDPX (-5.25).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.187 | 6.675 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.58B | 2,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 2.13 | 590% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.94 | 32.23 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.58 | -5.25 | -1,211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.78 | -14.04 | -504% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement