Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$21.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.92M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. TRGPX (748M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.43) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.46 vs. TRGPX (2.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. TRGPX (-21.04).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.349 | 2.583 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 748M | 5,548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 2.20 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 31.72 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | -21.04 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.83 | 2.22 | 4,231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement