Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$88.29
Change+$3.18 (+3.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$21.47
Change+$0.73 (+3.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets840.36M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TRGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. TRGPX (840M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.54) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. TRGPX (2.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.45 vs. TRGPX (6.74).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.349 | -2.583 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 840M | 4,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 2.83 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.19 | 19.82 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.45 | 6.74 | 1,104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.65 | -7.76 | -781% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers