Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$22.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets851.88M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TRGPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. TRGPX (852M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.32 vs. TRGPX (11.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.64 vs. TRGPX (3.61).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.419 | 5.026 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 852M | 4,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.32 | 11.47 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.68 | 38.71 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.64 | 3.61 | 1,844% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.26 | 0.78 | 9,600% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement