Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$23.00
Change+$0.11 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets860.24M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. TRGPX (860M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.46) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.67 vs. FSMAX (20.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.31 vs. TRGPX (-4.90).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.456 | 7.515 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 860M | 4,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.34 | 22.67 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.69 | 25.70 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.31 | -4.90 | -1,047% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.02 | 3.13 | 2,687% |