Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$76.01
Change-$3.55 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$18.03
Change+$1.11 (+6.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.93M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. TRGPX (714M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.53) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. TRGPX (-9.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. TRGPX (3.54).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.456 | -12.024 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 714M | 5,112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -9.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | -7.69 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 3.54 | 1,905% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.16 | -17.55 | -280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...