Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.07
Change-$0.68 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$23.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.65M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. TRGPX (849M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.83 vs. TRGPX (14.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.70 vs. TRGPX (-6.22).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.012 | 9.018 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 849M | 4,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.83 | 14.39 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.43 | 35.10 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.70 | -6.22 | -847% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.87 | 13.18 | 803% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement