Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TRGPX (619M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.49) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRGPX (17 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. TRGPX (-15.53). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. TRGPX (-34.50).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | -0.599 | -2,231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 619M | 6,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -15.53 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 8.27 | 773% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -34.50 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 2.70 | 4,939% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement