Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TRGPX (651M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRGPX (17 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. TRGPX (-7.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. TRGPX (-29.66).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 3.546 | 478% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 651M | 6,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -7.83 | -303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 13.53 | 538% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -29.66 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 2.69 | 4,994% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement