Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRMNX
FSMAX vs TRMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRMNX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.93
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index
Price$22.42
Change-$0.10 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.89M
FSMAX vs TRMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRMNX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. TRMNX (307M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRMNX: FSMAX (0.46) vs TRMNX (0.43). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRMNX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRMNX (10 years). TRMNX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.70 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRMNX: FSMAX (0) vs TRMNX (2500). TRMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.00 vs. FSMAX (21.86). TRMNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.29 vs. FSMAX (52.00).
| FSMAX | TRMNX | FSMAX / TRMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.27 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.30 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.566 | 8.061 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 307M | 12,899% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.86 | 28.00 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 46.59 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.00 | 57.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.21 | N/A | - |