Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRMNX
FSMAX vs TRMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRMNX
FSMAX vs TRMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TRMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. TRMNX (484M). TRMNX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TRMNX (0.67) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRMNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRMNX (10 years). TRMNX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRMNX: FSMAX (0) vs TRMNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.08 vs. TRMNX (16.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. TRMNX (27.89).
| FSMAX | TRMNX | FSMAX / TRMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.27 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.890 | 11.222 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 484M | 8,822% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.08 | 16.93 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.38 | 65.09 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.47 | 27.89 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.95 | 157.88 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement