Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRMNX
FSMAX vs TRMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRMNX
FSMAX vs TRMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRMNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. TRMNX (486M). TRMNX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TRMNX (0.67) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRMNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRMNX (11 years). TRMNX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRMNX: FSMAX (0) vs TRMNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. TRMNX (15.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. TRMNX (22.60).
| FSMAX | TRMNX | FSMAX / TRMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.27 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 10.588 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 486M | 8,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 15.34 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 63.29 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 22.60 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 165.35 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement