Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRMSX
FSMAX vs TRMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRMSX
FSMAX vs TRMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRMSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. TRMSX (486M). TRMSX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TRMSX (0.81) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRMSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRMSX (11 years). TRMSX (0.25) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRMSX: FSMAX (0) vs TRMSX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. TRMSX (16.92). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. TRMSX (24.95).
| FSMAX | TRMSX | FSMAX / TRMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.14 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.25 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | 11.187 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 486M | 8,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.81 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | 16.92 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 64.52 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | 24.95 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | 169.84 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement