Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRMSX
FSMAX vs TRMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRMSX
FSMAX vs TRMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRMSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TRMSX (494M). TRMSX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TRMSX (0.79) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRMSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRMSX (11 years). TRMSX (0.25) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRMSX: FSMAX (0) vs TRMSX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. TRMSX (4.00). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. TRMSX (22.66).
| FSMAX | TRMSX | FSMAX / TRMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.14 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.25 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 11.277 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 494M | 8,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.79 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 4.00 | 326% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 56.48 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 22.66 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 155.09 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement