Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRPWX
FSMAX vs TRPWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRPWX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.10
Change-$0.92 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$23.36
Change-$0.16 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets800.21M
FSMAX vs TRPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRPWX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. TRPWX (800M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRPWX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TRPWX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRPWX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRPWX (23 years). TRPWX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRPWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRPWX: FSMAX (0) vs TRPWX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. TRPWX (14.68). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.98 vs. TRPWX (-3.93).
| FSMAX | TRPWX | FSMAX / TRPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.50 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.50 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.158 | 9.040 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 800M | 5,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.75 | 14.68 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.28 | 52.43 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.98 | -3.93 | -1,627% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.37 | 18.00 | 652% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement