Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRPWX
FSMAX vs TRPWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRPWX
FSMAX vs TRPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRPWX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. TRPWX (681M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRPWX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TRPWX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRPWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRPWX (24 years). TRPWX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRPWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRPWX: FSMAX (0) vs TRPWX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. TRPWX (-5.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. TRPWX (-30.22).
| FSMAX | TRPWX | FSMAX / TRPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.50 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.50 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | 2.164 | 719% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 681M | 6,270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 2,728% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | -5.83 | -523% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 13.18 | 562% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | -30.22 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | 11.58 | 1,328% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement