Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRPWX
FSMAX vs TRPWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRPWX
FSMAX vs TRPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRPWX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TRPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. TRPWX (648M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRPWX: FSMAX (0.48) vs TRPWX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRPWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRPWX (24 years). TRPWX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRPWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRPWX: FSMAX (0) vs TRPWX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. TRPWX (-8.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. TRPWX (-30.28).
| FSMAX | TRPWX | FSMAX / TRPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.50 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.50 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 1.426 | 1,116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 648M | 6,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.02 | 2,646% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -8.13 | -300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 5.27 | 1,202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -30.28 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 4.25 | 3,276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers