Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRSZX
FSMAX vs TRSZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRSZX
FSMAX vs TRSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRSZX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TRSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TRSZX (508M). TRSZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TRSZX (0.89) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRSZX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRSZX (6 years). TRSZX (0.21) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and TRSZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.47 vs. TRSZX (8.82). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.84 vs. TRSZX (21.95).
| FSMAX | TRSZX | FSMAX / TRSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.21 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.420 | 12.624 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 508M | 7,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.47 | 8.82 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.94 | 56.45 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.84 | 21.95 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement