Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRSZX
FSMAX vs TRSZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRSZX
FSMAX vs TRSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRSZX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. TRSZX (488M). TRSZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TRSZX (0.89) vs FSMAX (0.48). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRSZX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TRSZX (6 years). TRSZX (0.21) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and TRSZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. TRSZX (8.36). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.29 vs. TRSZX (22.85).
| FSMAX | TRSZX | FSMAX / TRSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.21 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.324 | 10.498 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 488M | 8,914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 8.36 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.29 | 51.92 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.29 | 22.85 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers