Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VMCCX
FSMAX vs VMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VMCCX
FSMAX vs VMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VMCCX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and VMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. VMCCX (1.67B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VMCCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs VMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VMCCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VMCCX (17 years). VMCCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VMCCX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs VMCCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. VMCCX (-4.64). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. VMCCX (-1.24).
| FSMAX | VMCCX | FSMAX / VMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.03 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 3.486 | 584% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.67B | 2,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | -4.64 | -559% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | 7.02 | 1,058% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | -1.24 | -3,303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | 123.57 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers