Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VMCCX
FSMAX vs VMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VMCCX
FSMAX vs VMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VMCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and VMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. VMCCX (1.76B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VMCCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs VMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VMCCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VMCCX (17 years). VMCCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VMCCX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs VMCCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. VMCCX (-4.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. VMCCX (-0.92).
| FSMAX | VMCCX | FSMAX / VMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.03 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | -0.289 | -5,342% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.76B | 2,428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -4.45 | -657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 7.57 | 976% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -0.92 | -3,648% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 125.99 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers