Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VMFGX
FSMAX vs VMFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VMFGX
FSMAX vs VMFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VMFGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and VMFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. VMFGX (1.8B). VMFGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: VMFGX (0.61) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VMFGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VMFGX (15 years). FSMAX (0.04) is less costly to investors than VMFGX (0.03). VMFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMFGX: FSMAX (0) vs VMFGX (5000000). VMFGX (24.52) and FSMAX (23.68) have marching annual gain over last year. VMFGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.90 vs. FSMAX (40.14).
| FSMAX | VMFGX | FSMAX / VMFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 19.576 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.8B | 2,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 24.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 55.98 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | 44.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 164.99 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers