Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VNVAX
FSMAX vs VNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VNVAX
FSMAX vs VNVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VNVAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and VNVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. VNVAX (225M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VNVAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs VNVAX (0.08). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VNVAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VNVAX (18 years). VNVAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). VNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 163.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VNVAX: FSMAX (0) vs VNVAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. VNVAX (-16.96). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. VNVAX (-18.57).
| FSMAX | VNVAX | FSMAX / VNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.10 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 10.854 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 225M | 17,822% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.08 | 669% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -16.96 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -2.13 | -2,617% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -18.57 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 4.73 | 2,830% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers