Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VRMCX
FSMAX vs VRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VRMCX
FSMAX vs VRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VRMCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and VRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. VRMCX (1.65B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VRMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs VRMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VRMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VRMCX (9 years). VRMCX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VRMCX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRMCX: FSMAX (0) vs VRMCX (2500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. VRMCX (-4.32). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. VRMCX (2.64).
| FSMAX | VRMCX | FSMAX / VRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.87 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.020 | 1,311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.65B | 2,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -4.32 | -476% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 7.35 | 760% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | 2.64 | 1,259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers