Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VRMCX
FSMAX vs VRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VRMCX
FSMAX vs VRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VRMCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and VRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. VRMCX (1.72B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VRMCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs VRMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VRMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VRMCX (8 years). VRMCX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VRMCX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRMCX: FSMAX (0) vs VRMCX (2500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. VRMCX (-6.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. VRMCX (5.38).
| FSMAX | VRMCX | FSMAX / VRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.87 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 1.020 | 1,560% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 1.72B | 2,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -6.44 | -379% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 7.41 | 854% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | 5.38 | 728% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers