Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VRMGX
FSMAX vs VRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VRMGX
FSMAX vs VRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VRMGX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and VRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. VRMGX (383M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VRMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs VRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VRMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VRMGX (9 years). VRMGX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). VRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and VRMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.51 vs. VRMGX (-34.29). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. VRMGX (-45.02).
| FSMAX | VRMGX | FSMAX / VRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.83 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.705 | -3.340 | -560% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 383M | 10,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.51 | -34.29 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.84 | -24.70 | -283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | -45.02 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement