Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs VRMGX
FSMAX vs VRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs VRMGX
FSMAX vs VRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. VRMGX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and VRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. VRMGX (386M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than VRMGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs VRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than VRMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs VRMGX (8 years). VRMGX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). VRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRMGX: FSMAX (0) vs VRMGX (2500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. VRMGX (-37.36). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.29 vs. VRMGX (-45.59).
| FSMAX | VRMGX | FSMAX / VRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.83 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.324 | -5.278 | -271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 386M | 11,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | -37.36 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.29 | -28.03 | -212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.29 | -45.59 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement