Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.09
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$23.72
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.27M
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. WAMFX (171M). WAMFX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: WAMFX (0.52) vs FSMAX (0.47). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMAX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. WAMFX (9.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. WAMFX (44.76).
| FSMAX | WAMFX | FSMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 3.310 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 171M | 22,924% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.52 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 9.20 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 22.19 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 44.76 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | 64.39 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement