Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$23.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.42M
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. WAMFX (170M). WAMFX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: WAMFX (0.51) vs FSMAX (0.43). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMAX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. WAMFX (-2.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. WAMFX (23.31).
| FSMAX | WAMFX | FSMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | 2.221 | 292% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 170M | 24,412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.51 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -2.69 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 12.40 | 403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | 23.31 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 63.19 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement