Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. WAMFX (160M). WAMFX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: WAMFX (0.54) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WAMFX (15 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.06 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMAX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. WAMFX (3.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. WAMFX (10.54).
| FSMAX | WAMFX | FSMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 8.504 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 160M | 25,063% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.54 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 3.69 | 558% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 13.72 | 407% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | 10.54 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 70.61 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers