Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. WAMFX (152M). WAMFX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: WAMFX (0.58) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WAMFX (15 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.06 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMAX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. WAMFX (1.82). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. WAMFX (8.01).
| FSMAX | WAMFX | FSMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 2.404 | 642% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 152M | 28,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.58 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 1.82 | 1,606% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 14.58 | 506% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 8.01 | 420% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 67.02 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers