Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WFDRX
FSMAX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WFDRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.55
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.85M
FSMAX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WFDRX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. WFDRX (943M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: FSMAX (0.46) vs WFDRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. WFDRX (5.26). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.23 vs. WFDRX (-24.74).
| FSMAX | WFDRX | FSMAX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.79 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.401 | 3.164 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 943M | 4,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 5.26 | 351% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | 17.68 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.23 | -24.74 | -207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.14 | -10.04 | -828% |