Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs WFDRX
FSMAX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WFDRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$81.49
Change+$2.00 (+2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$28.62
Change+$0.86 (+3.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.32M
FSMAX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WFDRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. WFDRX (857M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: FSMAX (0.53) vs WFDRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.98 vs. WFDRX (-8.29). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.04 vs. WFDRX (-14.72).
| FSMAX | WFDRX | FSMAX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.79 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.533 | -12.180 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 857M | 4,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.98 | -8.29 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.93 | -1.91 | -573% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.04 | -14.72 | -449% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.78 | -22.57 | -221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...