Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WFDRX
FSMAX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WFDRX
FSMAX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WFDRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. WFDRX (709M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: FSMAX (0.49) vs WFDRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WFDRX (13 years). WFDRX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. WFDRX (-10.53). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. WFDRX (-47.01).
| FSMAX | WFDRX | FSMAX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.79 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 4.928 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 709M | 5,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -10.53 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 14.23 | 449% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -47.01 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | -0.97 | -13,769% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers