Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.87
Change-$0.52 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.21
Change-$0.08 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. WMGCX (5.03B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.47) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. WMGCX (-2.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.08 vs. WMGCX (-33.05).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.063 | 6.523 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 5.03B | 780% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.95 | -2.14 | -652% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.18 | -16.02 | -276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.08 | -33.05 | -176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.54 | -11.08 | -754% |