Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$86.92
Change-$2.39 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$16.52
Change-$0.42 (-2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.09B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. WMGCX (5.09B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.54) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. WMGCX (-14.23). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.82 vs. WMGCX (-27.61).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.728 | -1.340 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 5.09B | 708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | -14.23 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.07 | -16.76 | -239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.82 | -27.61 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.47 | -19.68 | -343% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers