Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$88.99
Change-$1.54 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$16.68
Change-$0.34 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.87B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. WMGCX (4.87B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. WMGCX (-12.72). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.48 vs. WMGCX (-30.09).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.080 | -2.854 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 4.87B | 772% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | -12.72 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.57 | -12.49 | -381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.48 | -30.09 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.64 | -20.57 | -324% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers