Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$97.95
Change-$0.72 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.03
Change-$0.17 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. WMGCX (4.74B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. WMGCX (-4.21). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.91 vs. WMGCX (-35.07).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.572 | 5.999 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 4.74B | 835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | -4.21 | -368% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.63 | -14.15 | -330% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.91 | -35.07 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.43 | -5.50 | -1,788% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement