Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.81
Change+$0.24 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.62B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WMGCX (4.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.24 vs. WMGCX (-4.66). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.35 vs. WMGCX (-32.67).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.98 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.662 | 5.999 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 4.62B | 888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.24 | -4.66 | -413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.90 | -10.08 | -564% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.35 | -32.67 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.81 | -4.51 | -2,279% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers