Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.11
Change-$0.46 (-2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.67B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. WMGCX (5.67B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (13 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. WMGCX (-11.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. WMGCX (-27.59).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | -0.349 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 5.67B | 739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | -11.30 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | -27.59 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | -27.59 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | -17.86 | -404% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers