Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. WMGCX (2.89B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WMGCX (26 years). WMGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. WMGCX (-15.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. WMGCX (-54.33).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.579 | 1.769 | 937% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 2.89B | 1,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.76 | -15.81 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.71 | -26.88 | -244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.74 | -54.33 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.62 | -15.91 | -884% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement