Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. WMGCX (2.76B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WMGCX (26 years). WMGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.06 vs. WMGCX (-18.41). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.73 vs. WMGCX (-56.12).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 0.068 | 20,340% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 2.76B | 1,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.06 | -18.41 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.47 | -28.63 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | -56.12 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.78 | -16.85 | -800% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers