Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.47
Change+$0.80 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R
Price$24.08
Change+$0.11 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.89B
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGRX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. WMGRX (4.89B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGRX: FSMAX (0.47) vs WMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGRX (20 years). WMGRX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and WMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. WMGRX (-7.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.52 vs. WMGRX (-22.73).
| FSMAX | WMGRX | FSMAX / WMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.29 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.48 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 2.305 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 4.89B | 801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | -7.70 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | -3.46 | -1,480% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.52 | -22.73 | -249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.23 | 4.22 | 1,807% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement