Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R
Price$24.65
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09B
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGRX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. WMGRX (6.09B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGRX: FSMAX (1.10) vs WMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGRX: FSMAX (13 years) vs WMGRX (19 years). WMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and WMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. WMGRX (2.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.34 vs. WMGRX (-7.26).
| FSMAX | WMGRX | FSMAX / WMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 5.207 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 6.09B | 670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.28 | 2.15 | 1,173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | -19.92 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | -7.26 | -748% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | 11.84 | 752% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...