Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R
Price$23.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.94B
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGRX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. WMGRX (3.94B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGRX: FSMAX (0.43) vs WMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGRX (20 years). WMGRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and WMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.46 vs. WMGRX (-9.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. WMGRX (-35.42).
| FSMAX | WMGRX | FSMAX / WMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.29 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.349 | -0.469 | -1,352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 3.94B | 1,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | -9.54 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | -8.51 | -584% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | -35.42 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.83 | 9.79 | 958% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers