Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R
Price$24.75
Change+$0.33 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.42B
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGRX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WMGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. WMGRX (4.42B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGRX: FSMAX (0.44) vs WMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGRX (20 years). WMGRX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and WMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. WMGRX (-6.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. WMGRX (-29.44).
| FSMAX | WMGRX | FSMAX / WMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.29 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.48 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | 4.225 | 278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 4.42B | 937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | -6.44 | -277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.00 | 0.87 | 7,839% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | -29.44 | -170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 15.57 | 673% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers