Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. WMGRX (2.75B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WMGRX (21 years). WMGRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and WMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. WMGRX (-12.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. WMGRX (-46.47).
| FSMAX | WMGRX | FSMAX / WMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.29 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 1.423 | 1,190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.75B | 1,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -12.20 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | -12.12 | -600% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -46.47 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 4.91 | 2,741% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers