Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WSMNX
FSMAX vs WSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WSMNX
FSMAX vs WSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WSMNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WSMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. WSMNX (1.28B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WSMNX: FSMAX (0.48) vs WSMNX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WSMNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WSMNX (23 years). WSMNX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSMNX: FSMAX (0) vs WSMNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. WSMNX (17.67). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. WSMNX (-19.98).
| FSMAX | WSMNX | FSMAX / WSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 13.033 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 1.28B | 3,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 17.67 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 3.46 | 1,831% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -19.98 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 44.10 | 316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement